1990-1993 Chevrolet S10 Pickup: Road Test

We prefer V6 engines in an S10, because automatic transmissions rob too much performance from the 4-cylinder. If you definitely must have a 4-cylinder, stick with manual shift. The 2.8-liter V6 is adequate for most 2-wheel-drive requirements, but the brawny 4.3-liter engine sends these trucks to the head of their class for acceleration and towing prowess. A basic long-bed 2WD with the 4.3-liter V6 and automatic averaged about 21.5 mpg. A short bed with the same powertrain but with a Baja 4x4 package averaged just 16 mpg. Rear-wheel ABS improves control in stops, but otherwise, braking power is nothing special. Extended-cab models have 18.3 cubic feet of storage space behind the front seats (13.7 cubic feet if equipped with optional jump seats, which are large enough only for children). Even when equipped with extra-cost interior trim packages, these pickups tend to feel crude inside, with too many sharp plastic edges and a cheap feel to most controls. The optional front stabilizer bar improves steering response and reduces body lean in turns. Heavy-duty shock absorbers are also a good idea, cutting down on bouncing and pitching. Analog gauges are standard, and are easier to read than the optional electronic cluster.

Value for the Money
Popular for both work and play, S10 pickups score well against their natural rival, the Ford Ranger, and the availability of the 4.3-liter V6 engine placed the S10 a step ahead of its competition.