1990-1992 Mazda 626: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Mazda 626
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Antilock brakes (optional)
- Acceleration (GT)
- Fuel economy
Cons
- Acceleration (w/automatic transmission)
- Automatic-transmission performance
- Torque steer (GT)
Vehicle Highlights
The third generation of Mazda's compact sedan had been introduced in 1988. The 4-door (notchback or hatchback) was still called 626, but the related coupe, named MX-6, now rode a shorter wheelbase. For 1990, antilock braking was newly optional on the mid-range 626 LX model, and also on the more costly hatchback GT Touring Sedan. Also new was a fresh grille and new taillamps. DX and LX sedans carried a 110-horsepower, 2.2-liter 4-cylinder engine. A turbocharged rendition of that 2.2-liter was installed in the GT model, developing 145 horsepower.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Mazda 626 LX 4-cylinder Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 4 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 44 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1992 Mazda 626 includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1992 Mazda 626 and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1992 Mazda 626 is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
All in all, this is a refined rival to the Honda Accord or Toyota Camry. In addition to a selection of practical virtues, you get Mazda's reputation for above-average reliability.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Mazda 626 LX 4-cylinder Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4 | |
| Fuel Economy | 6 | |
| Ride Quality | 4 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 4 | |
| Quietness | 4 | |
| Controls/Materials | 4 | |
| Interior Room | 4 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 4 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 4 | |
| Value within Class | 6 | |
| Total Score: | 44 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $550 |
| Alternator | $230 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $1,005 |
| Brakes | $235 |
| Clutch, Pressure Plate, Bearing | $610 |
| Constant Velocity Joints | $565 |
| Exhaust System | $915 |
| Radiator | $520 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $715 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $170 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1992 | |||
| 626 sedan | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 1991 | |||
| 626 hatchback | $1,100-1,400 | $700-900 | $100-200 |
| 626 sedan | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
| 1990 | |||
| 626 hatchback | $1,000-1,300 | $600-800 | $100 |
| 626 sedan | $0 | $0 | $0 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 4-door hatchback | 4-door sedan |
| Wheelbase, in. | 101.4 | 101.4 |
| Overall Length, in. | 179.3 | 179.3 |
| Overall Width, in. | 66.5 | 66.5 |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.1 | 55.5 |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 2710 | 2610 |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 22.4 | 15.9 |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | -- |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 15.9 | 15.9 |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | 5 |
| Front Head Room, in. | 38.7 | 39.0 |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 43.6 | 43.7 |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.2 | 37.8 |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 32.9 | 36.6 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohc I4 | 2.2 / 133 | 110 | 130 | 5-speed manual: 24/31 4-speed automatic: 22/28 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: 23.7 |
| Turbocharged ohc I4 | 2.2 / 133 | 145 | 190 | 5-speed manual: 21/28 4-speed automatic: 19/25 |
5-speed manual: -- 4-speed automatic: -- |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








