1990-1992 Lincoln Mark VII: Full Review
Updated: 11/23/08
Reviews & Ratings
Pricing
Explore
Specifications & Safety
Related to Lincoln Mark VII
Related Reviews
View Another Vehicle
Pros
- Acceleration
- Quietness
- Antilock brakes
- Handling
Cons
- Fuel economy
- Rear-seat room
- Cargo room
- Rear-seat entry/exit
- Ride (except 1990 Bill Blass)
Vehicle Highlights
Introduced in 1984, Lincoln's stylish rear-wheel drive luxury coupe got a revised grille and a driver-side airbag for '90. Antilock braking had been standard since 1986. Two five-passenger models went on sale: a sporty LSC touring coupe and a luxurious Bill Blass Designer series. Both continued to use a 5.0-liter V8 engine, making 225 horsepower, hooked to a 4-speed overdrive automatic transmission. Both models included a self-leveling suspension, automatic climate control, remote decklid release and power decklid pull-down, and 6-way power front seats. A power glass moonroof was optional.
Expert Ratings Summary (view detailed report)
| Category | Lincoln Mark VII LSC Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 8 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Year to Year Changes
Our road test for the 1990-1992 Lincoln Mark VII includes a full evaluation from the inside out. We've evaluated every aspect of the 1990-1992 Lincoln Mark VII and highlighted the vehicle's performance with pros and cons. Use our comprehensive road test ratings to decide if this generation 1990-1992 Lincoln Mark VII is right for you.
Consumer Guide® Road-Test Evaluation
All told, a Mark VII can still be a good alternative to the front-wheel drive Cadillac Eldorado, the Acura Legend Coupe, or the Lexus SC 300.
Expert Ratings Summary
| Category | Lincoln Mark VII LSC Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 8 | |
| Fuel Economy | 2 | |
| Ride Quality | 5 | |
| Steering/Handling/Braking | 5 | |
| Quietness | 6 | |
| Controls/Materials | 6 | |
| Interior Room | 5 | |
| Room/Comfort (rear) | 2 | |
| Cargo Capacity | 2 | |
| Value within Class | 4 | |
| Total Score: | 45 |
Trouble Spots
Consumer Guide® Estimated Repair Costs
| Item Name | Repair Cost |
| A/C Compressor | $325 |
| Alternator | $425 |
| Automatic Transmission or Transaxle | $880 |
| Brakes | $300 |
| Exhaust System | $540 |
| Radiator | $290 |
| Shocks and/or Struts | $235 |
| Timing Chain or Belt | $220 |
| Universal Joints | $470 |
| Prices | Good | Average | Poor |
|
|
|||
| 1992 | |||
| Mark VII | $1,700-2,200 | $1,100-1,500 | $300 |
| 1991 | |||
| Mark VII | $1,400-1,900 | $900-1,200 | $200 |
| 1990 | |||
| Mark VII | $1,200-1,700 | $700-1,000 | $100-200 |
|
|
|||
Vehicle Dimensions
| Specification | 2-door coupe | |
| Wheelbase, in. | 108.5 | |
| Overall Length, in. | 202.8 | |
| Overall Width, in. | 70.9 | |
| Overall Height, in. | 54.2 | |
| Curb Weight, lbs. | 3782 | |
| Cargo Volume, cu. ft. | 14.2 | |
| Standard Payload, lbs. | -- | |
| Fuel Capacity, gals. | 21.0 | |
| Seating Capacity | 5 | |
| Front Head Room, in. | 37.8 | |
| Max. Front Leg Room, in. | 42.0 | |
| Rear Head Room, in. | 37.1 | |
| Max. Rear Leg Room, in. | 36.9 | |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
||
Powertrain Options and Availability
| Engines | cu. in |
Horse- power | Torque | Transmission: |
Consumer Guide Observed |
| ohv V8 | 5.0 / 302 | 225 | 300 | 4-speed automatic: 17/24 | 4-speed automatic: 15.2 |
|
Specifications Key: NA = not available; "--" = measurement does not exist. |
|||||
NHTSA Crash-Test Results
Vehicle crash test information not available at this time.The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) tests a vehicle's worthiness in front- and side-impact collisions and rates its resistance to rollovers. Front-impact crash-test numbers indicate the chance of serious injury: 5 = 10% or less; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-35%; 2 = 35-45%; 1 = More than 45%. Sideimpact crash-test numbers indicate: 5 = 5% or less; 4 = 6-10%; 3 = 11-20%; 2 = 21-25%; 1 = More than 26%. Rollover resistance numbers indicate the chance for rollover when the vehicle leaves the roadway: 5 = Less than 10%; 4 = 10-20%; 3 = 20-30%; 2 = 30-40%; 1 = More than 40%.








